Trouble for Bannon as Prosecutors Make Clear They Can Make Their Case Against Him in a Single Day

Prosecutors overseeing the lawsuit against White House main strategist Steve Bannon connected charges of contempt of Congress made wide they tin marque their lawsuit against him successful a azygous day, according to a tribunal filing.

“The Government anticipates that its case-in-chief volition dwell of 1 time of testimony,” prosecutors said successful the report, adding that they privation to prohibit Bannon from employing immoderate defence that claims that helium was acting connected the proposal of his lawyers erstwhile helium defied the subpoena from the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the events of January 6.

The Justice Department and Bannon’s defence disagree connected a timeline for the trial. While the Justice Department has projected opening Bannon’s proceedings connected April 15, 2022, Bannon’s lawyers person projected an October 17, 2022 date, arguing that they request much clip to cod evidence.

“This lawsuit raises analyzable law issues of archetypal impression,” the filing reads. “Some of these issues impact inter-branch relationships and connected the operations of the U.S. authorities astatine its highest levels. There is nary ground for having these issues adjudicated connected a rushed basis.”

Prosecutors criticized Bannon past week, saying that helium is trying to marque his lawsuit a proceedings by media “rather than successful court.”

The prosecution’s comments came aft Bannon’s defence requested that the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s bureau unseal each grounds successful the case, including expansive assemblage testimony.

“The defense’s misleading claims, nonaccomplishment to confer, unexplained wholesale opposition, and extrajudicial statements marque wide the defense’s existent purpose: to maltreatment transgression find to effort this lawsuit successful the media alternatively than successful court,” the prosecutors wrote successful a tribunal filing, arguing that unsealing the evidence would undermine the privateness of immoderate witnesses who whitethorn person testified to the expansive assemblage and undermine their grounds during trial.

“The defendant’s menace of ‘going connected offense’ and making this lawsuit ‘hell’ cannot beryllium ignored erstwhile considering these witnesses’ privateness interests successful their idiosyncratic inheritance information,” the filing reads.